|
In
a Cutt Newsletter (2004) issue it is mentioned that while current 3G
services are working to enable transactional wireless communications
like location-based services, wireless shopping, personal services,
email and multimedia data transfer, these are at much lower speeds
compared to the 100 MBPS to 1 GBPS of 4G.
As
demand builds for high-quality, streaming video and audio, only 4G
systems will be able to accommodate growing consumer and business
expectations. Japan, China and South Korea plan to work together
with developing new technologies like fourth-generation mobile
phones says Japanese local papers.
Ongoing
talks have been underway for the last several months to discuss how
to work together in the best possible way including |
|
those for the 2008 Beijing Olympics and future Internet systems,
said an official at the telecommunications ministry.
A
4G orientated meeting was held in Seoul in March with officials from
the above countries, where they agreed to share information and work
together on developing 4G mobile phones.
In
Eliza Evans and others (2004) the implications of 4G network are
discussed in detail. They predict that if implemented, the projected
4G technology may facilitate a true IP cellular network. 4G mobile
phone technology supports Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) and
promises faster communication speeds (100 megabits per second),
capacity and diverse usage formats. These formats would provide
richer content and support for other public networks such as optical
fibre and wireless local area networks.
4G
is currently only an ideal. Still, some companies are incorporating
new technological advances into cellular technology, something that
some companies are calling “3.5G.” 3.5G technology, the
convergence of cellular and wireless LAN technologies, has led to a
handset that makes calls using Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)
when a 802.11 network is available (for example, when at home or at
the office), then switches to a 3G cellular network when mobile.
Someday
4G networks may replace all existing 2.5G and 3G networks, perhaps
even before a full deployment of 3G. Multiple 3G standards are
springing up that would make it difficult for 3G devices to be truly
global. A strong need exists to combine both the wireless (LAN)
concept and cell or base station wide area network design. 4G is
seen as the solution that will bridge that gap and thereby provide a
much more robust network.
Table
2, lists down the comparison between 3G and the upcoming 4G
networks.
|
Major requirement driving architecture
|
3G (Including 2.5G, Sub3G)
|
4G
|
|
|
Predominantly voice driven; data was always add
on
|
Converged data and voice
over IP
|
|
Network Architecture
|
Wide area cell-based
|
Hybrid: Integration of
wireless LAN (WiFi, Bluetooth) and wide area
|
|
Speeds
|
384 Kbps to 2 Mbps
|
20 to 100 Mbps in mobile
mode
|
|
Frequency Band
|
Dependent on country or
continent (1800‐2400 MHz)
|
Higher frequency bands (2-8 GHz)
|
|
Bandwidth
|
5-20 MHz
|
100 MHz (or more)
|
|
Switching Design Basis
|
Circuit and Packet
|
All digital with packetized
voice
|
|
Access Technologies
|
W-CDMA, 1xRTT, Edge
|
OFDM and MC-CDMA (Multi Carrier
CDMA)
|
|
Forward Error Correction
|
Convolutional rate 1/2, 1/3
|
Concatenated coding scheme
|
|
Component Design
|
Optimized antenna design, multi-band adapters
|
Smarter Antennas, software multiband and wideband
radios
|
|
IP
|
A number of air link protocols,
including IP 5.0
|
All IP (IPv6)
|
Table
2:
Differences between 3G and 4G
Source:
www.mobileinfo.com
|