|
Again,
Daniel Collins and Clint Smith (2002) state that unlike
first-generation systems, which are analog, second-generation
systems are digital. The use of digital technology has a number of
advantages, including increased capacity, greater security against
fraud, and more advanced services. They point out three major
technologies that were introduced in second generation namely,
IS-54B and IS-136, GSM and CDMA.
Like
first-generation systems, various types of second-generation
technology have been developed. The three most successful variants
of second-generation technology are Interim Standard 136 (IS-136)
TDMA, IS-95 CDMA, and the Global System for Mobile communications (GSM).
Each of these came about in very different ways. |
|
IS-136
came about through a two-stage evolution from analog AMPS. As
described in more detail later, AMPS is a frequency division
multiple access (FDMA) system, with each channel occupying 30 KHz.
Some of the channels, known as control channels, are dedicated to
control signalling and some, known as voice channels, are dedicated
to carrying the actual voice conversation.
The
first step in digitizing this system was the introduction of digital
voice channels. This step involved the application of time division
multiplexing (TDM) to the voice channels such that each voice
channel was divided into time slots, enabling up to three
simultaneous conversations on the same RF channel. This stage in the
evolution was known as IS-54 B (also known as Digital AMPS or
D-AMPS) and it obviously gives a significant capacity boost compared
to analog AMPS. IS-54 B was introduced in 1990.
Daniel
Collins and Clint Smith (2002) discuss, why there was a need for a
global system for mobile communications and CDMA technology.
Although NMT had been introduced in Europe as recently as 1981, the
Europeans soon recognized the need for a pan-European digital
system. There were many reasons for this, but a major reason was the
fact that multiple incompatible analog systems were being deployed
across Europe. It was understood that a single Europe-wide digital
system could enable seamless roaming between countries as well as
features and capabilities not possible with analog systems.
Consequently, in 1982, the Conference on European Posts and
Telecommunications (CEPT) embarked on developing such a system. The
organization established a group called (in French) Group Speciale
Mobile (GSM). This group was assigned the necessary technical work
involved in developing this new digital standard. Much work was done
over several years before the newly created European
Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) took over the effort
in 1989. Under ETSI, the first set of technical specifications was
finalized, and the technology was given the same name as the group
that had originally begun the work on its development—GSM.
The
first GSM network was launched in 1991, with several more launched
in 1992. International roaming between the various networks quickly
followed. GSM was hugely successful and soon, most countries in
Europe had launched GSM service. Furthermore, GSM began to spread
outside Europe to countries as far away as Australia. It was clear
that GSM was going to be more than just a European system; it was
going to be global. Consequently, the letters GSM have taken on a
new meaning—Global System for Mobile communications.
Although
they have significant differences, both IS-136 and GSM use Time
Division Multiple Access (TDMA). This means that individual radio
channels are divided into timeslots, enabling a number of users to
share a single RF channel on a time-sharing basis. For several
reasons, this technique offers an increase in capacity compared to
an analog system where each radio channel is dedicated to a single
conversation. TDMA is not the only system that enables multiple
users to share a given radio frequency, however. A number of other
options exist—most notably Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA).
CDMA is a technique whereby all users share the
same frequency at the same time. Obviously, since all users share
the same frequency simultaneously, they all interfere with each
other. The challenge is to pick out the signal of one user from all
of the other signals on the same frequency. This can be done if the
signal from each user is modulated with a unique code sequence,
where the code bit rate is far higher than the bit rate of the
information being sent. At the receiving end, knowledge of the code
sequence being used for a given signal allows the signal to be
extracted.
|